Pressefreiheit oder so...

  • Pressefreiheit beinhaltet ja auch "frei". Manchmal bekommt man als Journalist sogar Geld für Frei-drehen. So wie Jackson ...




    SFA to block Rangers slashing Celtic ticket allocation for Scottish Cup clashes at Ibrox
    The Ibrox side promised to cut the number of tickets given to their rivals from 8000 to just over 800.




    By
    Keith Jackson

    • 06:00, 7 JUN 2018
    • Updated07:18, 7 JUN 2018



    Ian Maxwell won’t allow Rangers to lock Celtic supporters out of Ibrox if the feuding neighbours collide in next season’s Scottish Cup.
    Rangers have promised to cut Celtic’s ticket allocation from 8000 to just more than 800 for league matches on their own ground next season. In a tit-for-tat move Celtic threatened to take similar action when Steven Gerrard’s side travel across the Clyde.
    But under SFA rules, visiting clubs are entitled to 20 per cent of available seats for Scottish Cup ties.
    Which would mean both clubs could demand more than 10,000 tickets for their fans should they be pulled out of the hat together before the semi-finals. And Maxwell has no intention of endorsing a lockout on away fans as he attempts to land a bumper TV deal for next season’s competition.
    He said: “There is guidance in the rules, a minimum percentage.
    “It is important that supporters get a chance to go and support their team.
    “The SFA rules on crowd percentage have been in place for a while and there is no desire as far as I am aware to look at them.”


    https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/…-slashing-celtic-12658600


    Total blödsinnige Schaumschlägerei.


    Die Pokalspiele standen nie zur Debatte, aber Jackson geht voll auf Konfrontation: "wir kürzen Celtics Stadionanteil" (nein, den aller Vereine zugunsten unserer DKs!) Aber "die SFA wird das bei Pokalspielen verhindern!" ... obgleich die garnicht zur Debatte stehen.

  • Es ist schon fast tragisch, wie krampfhaft immer wieder negative Rangers-Stories gezimmert werden. :ohmei:

    :rfc: Simply a Bear :rfc:

  • Pressefreiheit in Schottland heißt, daß man jemanden der über Jahre hinweg mit Wissen des Vereins Kinder missbraucht hat, mit keinem Sterbenswörtchen erwähnt, schon garnicht dessen Verein und den Fakt, das dieser ihn nicht anzeigte. Nein, aber wenn mal einer bei uns war, den wir augenblicklich anzeigten und feuerten (was die Hibs nicht taten, obwohl sie es wußten), wird das so eingebaut, als wäre das bei uns Gang und Gebe gewesen. Man nennt sowas dann Verleumdung und es hat nichts mit dem zu tun, was eine neutrale Presse eigentlich tun sollte. Rechte haben sie alle, aber Pflicht zur ganzen Wahrheit vergessen sie mal eben ...



    SFA face compensation claim from six survivors of alleged sex abuse who were 'failed miserably'

    Lawyers accused the footballing body of a “wilful disregard” which allowed suspected paedophiles to prey on children, while victims blasted SFA chairman's apology.


    ix survivors of alleged sexual abuse by football officials today announced they are suing the SFA for compensation.
    Lawyers for the victims – who have given harrowing accounts of their ordeals – accused the footballing body of a “wilful disregard” which allowed suspected paedophiles to prey on children.
    One survivor said the SFA must take care of those it had “already failed miserably”.
    Thompsons Solicitors, representing the six, said they are sending the Scottish Football Association paperwork for the civil damages action.
    Legal sources said the SFA could face a multi-million-pound settlement over the court claims.



    The legal bid comes just days after SFA chairman Ian Maxwell offered a “heartfelt” apology to youngsters who suffered sex abuse while under their care.
    Maxwell delivered his message to survivors as interim findings from a review into historical abuse were published last week.
    The review found football’s child protection policies were “not fit for purpose”.
    Thompsons said it was the SFA’s “professional duty” to put in place safeguards they “failed completely in that duty”.
    Peter Haynes, who previously told how he was abused by SFA official and coach Hugh Stevenson, who died in 2004, is among the claimants.



    Peter said Stevenson subjected him him to a three or four year campaign of sexual abuse, including rape, from 1979.
    He said: “SFA chief executive Ian Maxwell has told the country he believes his organisation’s child protection
    policies are a success.
    “I have asked him to clarify his statement. He has not as yet agreed to this. The hurt his statement caused to myself, my family and other survivors is beyond measure.
    “How on Earth can they say they haven’t failed children in the past?
    “Mr Maxwell says the SFA want a world-class child safety policy. That should begin with taking care of those it has already failed miserably.”
    Fellow Thompsons client John Cleland has told how he was abused by Rangers and Hibs football coach Gordon Neely, who died in 2014.


    Gordon Neely during his time at Rangers (Image: Internet Unknown)
    John said he was subjected to 18 months of serious sexual abuse aged 11 in Edinburgh in the early 80s.



    John said “The SFA are responsible for making sure that those coaching
    our children are people we can trust yet they completely failed me and
    my family.



    “I now wait to see if their words admitting their failings are backed up by action.



    “I sincerely hope that other survivors abused in Scottish football now feel able to come forward to have their voices heard.”



    Patrick McGuire of Thompsons said: “As the body in charge of Scottish
    football at all levels, the SFA is responsible for the welfare of
    children taking part in our game.



    “It is to the SFA’s complete and utter shame that, due to their
    incompetence and at times wilful disregard, criminals of the worst kind
    preyed on youngsters who only wanted to play football.



    “The legal action for compensation that my firm is undertaking on behalf
    of our clients is part of the process of seeking justice and it’s one
    that I expect the SFA to take very seriously and settle promptly.”


    Former SFA official and coach Hugh Stevenson (Image: BBC Scotland)
    Ex-Paisley youth football coach accused of catalogue of historic child sex abuse
    Janine Rennie, chief executive of the charity Wellbeing Scotland, said:
    “Survivors were disbelieved and ignored by the authorities for years but
    they are taking back control and now the SFA have admitted their
    terrible failings.”



    Maxwell said recommendations from last week’s report would be
    implemented but stressed Scottish football was “a safe place for
    children”.



    The independent review – set up 18 months ago by the SFA – found
    systemic gaps that still leave children at risk, and ruled that there
    was a shortfall in money and resources to tackle the issue.



    The final version of the report is being withheld until criminal proceedings
    are concluded.



    By last November, Police Scotland said almost 300 crimes had been recorded during a year-long probe.



    Officers identified 153 victims and arrested and charged 13 people with offences relating to historic child sexual abuse.



    A spokesman for the SFA said they could not comment on the legal action as they hadn’t received the paperwork from Thompson’s.



    Rangers tell alleged child abuse victim to 'take compensation claim to liquidator'
    Timeline
    1979 The year coach Hugh Stevenson began abusing Peter Haynes.



    Around 1981 John Cleland first abused by coach Gordon Neely.



    1994 Peter says he first told former SFA chief executive Jim Farry about Hugh Stevenson.



    2004 Abuser Hugh Stevenson dies.



    2014 Abuser Gordon Neely dies aged 62.



    December 2016 Victims publicly allege abuse by Neely.



    December 13 2016 SFA commissions independent review following allegations of historical sexual abuse in the sport.



    May 2018 A former youth footballer sexually abused by
    Neely told by Rangers he should pursue his complaint with liquidators.
    The club said the abuse took place when Rangers were owned by a
    different company, now in liquidation.



    July 26 2018 Independent review’s interim report brands football’s child protection policies “not fit for purpose”.



    Today Six survivors of alleged abuse announce they are suing SFA.


    https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/…sation-claim-six-13001352

  • Dahingehend ...


    Timeline
    1979 The year coach Hugh Stevenson began abusing Peter Haynes.
    Around 1981 John Cleland first abused by coach Gordon Neely.


    vs


    Talent scout Neely was a youth coach who worked at Rangers for more than three years after leaving Hibernian in 1986.


    Der DR schreibt ...


    Neely formerly of Rangers.
    Neely in his time at Rangers.


    Neely's Opfer wurde in Edinburgh mißbraucht. So schlimm das ist, wieso zeigen sie immer wieder mit dem Finger auf uns? Und wieso taucht bei all den Zahlen und Fakten ...


    By last November, Police Scotland said almost 300 crimes had been recorded during a year-long probe.
    Officers identified 153 victims and arrested and charged 13 people with offences relating to historic child sexual abuse.


    ... ein Name und ein Verein in den Berichten so gut wie nie oder garnicht auf? Und wir werden mit Dreck beworfen.

  • Robbie Savage has trolled Chris Sutton on Twitter after Celtic’s goalless draw against St Mirren on Friday night


    Da gehen die "Experten" also mal wieder aufeinander los...


    Natürlich hat Savage recht damit. Denn was sich Sutton unter der Woche mal wieder leistete, war an Peinlichkeiten kaum zu überbieten.


    So ließ er sich darüber aus, dass McGregor nicht nachträglich gesperrt wurde und führte dabei noch gerne Naismith als Beispiel gegen Celtic mit an und das die rote Karte von Morelos in Aberdeen aufgehoben wurde.


    Und ja, auch wenn er ein totales grünes ********* ist, der pures Gift für den Sport ist, so waren alle Beispiele richtig. Das ist eben der Unterschied. Wir können das ohne Probleme zugeben. Grün kann das nie.


    Denn wo waren die Beispiele Gordon, Griffiths oder ständig Brown? Um nur einige Grüne zu nennen. Nicht ein Wort. Auch kein Wort darüber, dass wir in Aberdeen komplett verpfiffen wurden. Da wird die eine nachträgliche Fehlentscheidung (mit dem Spiel hatte sie ja nichts zu tun) aufgeführt und kein Wort über die locker 5 mit für den Spielausgang entscheidenden Fehlentscheidungen gegen uns.


    Das kann man als Fan machen. Und das kann auch jeder grüne Ex-Spieler, der bis zum heutigen Tag vom Hass zerfressen ist. Aber das es diese Schwachköpfe als Experten im schottischen Fussball gibt (Hartson ist ja nicht anders), ist ein absolutes Armutszeugnis. Das mögen ja einige, vor allem Grüne, täglich witzig finden. Nach außen gibt es jedoch ein ganz schwaches Bild ab. Aber das scheint ja gewollt. Erbärmlich.

    :rfc: Simply a Bear :rfc:

  • Stevie Gerrard is immense at handling the Scottish media


    So geht es eigentlich jede Woche. Die "Journalisten" versuchen ihre Spielchen zu spielen, aber Gerrard ist das halt gewohnt. Ein Frischling als Trainer, ja, aber dennoch die Öffentlichkeit seit Kindesbeinen an gewohnt.


    Man könnte ja sagen, lass sie sich Woche für Woche lächerlich machen und gegen die Wand laufen, aber sie vernachlässigen einfach ihren Job. So wird wieder nicht die Frage nach Ausfällen gestellt. Das ist doch aber z.B. was die Öffentlichkeit interessiert. Das sind Dir aber auch Flaschen, echt.

    :rfc: Simply a Bear :rfc:

  • Pressefreiheit ... die beiden Enden der Skala in Schottland. Auf der einen Seite gibt ein offensichtlicher Celtic-Anhänger des Glasgower Stadtrats übelste sektiererische Beleidigungen zum Besten, doch der Artikel in der ET (und anderen Zeitungen) erwähnt seine Vorlieben nicht:


    https://www.eveningtimes.co.uk…rian-remarks/?ref=mr&lp=4


    Vergleiche dazu auch den Sectarianism in Scotland - Thread.


    Aber wenn es um die Opferrolle geht, dann ist man sofort mit einem nebensächlichen Fakt dabei und spinnt den Artikel drum herum:





    So tragisch das auch ist, wird hier völlig unnötig die Celtic-Opferkarte gezogen, obgleich der genausogut ein Battlefield 1 - Spieler oder Hundetrainer hätte sein können ... und vielleicht sogar ist.


    Die Mhedienlandschaft ist schon eigen da oben.

  • Wär' ich zynisch, könnte ich sagen, die haben das mit dem Yahoo-Fan Zeugs absichtlich getan, um unterschwellig anzudeuten, man hätte ihn umgebracht, weil er ein Yahoo ist ... anstatt daß er einfach besoffen in die Clyde stürzte.

  • Mal was Normales - allerdings auch aus der Feder eines eher pro-Rangers Reporters - zum Thema "strict liability", was die (lustigerweise) SNP-MPs ja so vehement fordern, letztlich aber wieder nur in eine Richtung zielen soll. Denn die Schaumschläger sind allesamt Yahoos oder Yahhoofreundlich ...


    Chris Jack: Holyrood laws punishing clubs and ordinary football fans won't solve Scotland's societal ills


    [Blockierte Grafik: https://www.eveningtimes.co.uk…images/3793918?type=thumb]



    By Christopher Jack @Chris_Jack89 Group Senior Sports Writer


    WHEN the solution to problem is a one size fits all quick fix, you know you don’t actually have the answer. Not really.

    Yes, you can be seen to be doing something, anything, but by the time
    your plan is put in place and you realise it doesn’t really work, it is
    too late.

    Where the Offensive Behaviour at Football Act led, legislation that
    implements strict liability could now follow if some, including James
    Dornan MSP,
    who championed it in SportTimes this week, have their way. The last
    thing that the Scottish FA and SPFL need is interference from Holyrood,
    though.

    Football supporters have little enough faith in the Scottish FA and SPFL as it is without a divisive Government sticking its nose in. Our game doesn’t need party politics.

    The idea that the OBFA would transform Scotland’s
    issues with sectarianism was flawed from the beginning and the notion
    that punishing clubs will stop misbehaviour within elements of their
    support is equally as mistaken.

    Lifting football supporters out of the stands or barging through their
    front doors at dawn won’t change attitudes on either side of the
    religious divide.

    And shutting stands or docking points from teams won’t prevent the
    mindless and the moronic from embarrassing themselves or dragging the
    names of their club and their fellow fans through the mud.

    Football may give a platform to imbeciles, but Ministers should be
    wondering why they have their mentality in the first place. Forget what
    colours they wear, what is it about their schooling, their upbringing,
    their lifestyle, that means they think it is acceptable to behave in
    such a manner?

    The overwhelming percentage of supporters are fair and law-abiding and
    there is not suddenly a crisis in Scottish football. Penalising the
    majority for the actions of the minority through strict liability isn’t
    the way forward, but naming, shaming and punishing those that step out
    of line, within current legislative framework, is.

    Look at Celtic.
    UEFA have handed down that many fines over the last few years that
    Peter Lawwell would be as well setting up a direct debit straight to
    Nyon.

    The Hoops
    have been punished for everything from pyrotechnics to Palestinian
    flags to pitch invaders. Fans were fully aware of what would happen
    under those strict liability rules, but they still acted in a manner
    that ensured their club was in the dock once again.

    If the threat of fines, deductions or stadium closures was enough of a
    deterrent, then UEFA would never have a case to look at because fans
    across Europe would behave appropriately week in week out.

    The type of idiot that thinks it is acceptable to throw a coin at a
    linesman, manager or player shouldn’t be inside a ground. Neither should
    those who sprayed ‘hang Neil Lennon’ outside Tynecastle or hung
    effigies of Rangers supporters and Orangemen from the Parkhead stands.

    The mindset that leads people to such cowardly and crass acts cannot
    be comprehended but they are society’s problem as much as football’s and
    the game shouldn’t suffer because of Scotland’s ills.

    Calum Spence didn’t deserve to be attacked during Livingston’s game
    with Rangers, and neither did Neil Lennon or keeper Zdenek Zlamalat
    Tynecastle or Alfredo Morelos at St Mirren this week.

    If you believe that the motive behind the assault on Lennon was
    racism, then surely there will be an equal condemnation of the incident
    involving Colombian striker Morelos? Was Morelos targeted because of his
    colour or, as is more likely and as many believe in the Lennon
    and Zlamal cases, because an idiot with a short fuse and nothing between
    his ears lost whatever modicum of sense he had and took it out on the
    figure he hated in that instant?

    How about the shameful abuse that Nacho Novo has had to endure whilst
    he was at Rangers and in the years since he retired? Is that a
    bitterness towards the Spanish or a football rivalry taken to the
    extreme and to completely abhorrent levels?

    Were all of those incidents just moments of madness and unhinged
    stupidity by people that should not only be banned from the game but
    feel the full force of the Law? Or signs of deeper troubles within our
    country that can’t possibly be addressed by taking three points off in
    the Premiership?

    Scotland’s problems - with sectarianism, violence and alcohol – are
    real and serious but they won’t be solved by targeting football. There
    is only so much that clubs can control, only so many times they can
    condemn.

    The victims in these incidents are the innocent parties. The perpetrators are the only ones that should be punished, though.


    https://www.eveningtimes.co.uk…-scotlands-societal-ills/

  • Und natürlich flattert Ciaran gleich auf Twitter daher und behauptet, daß unsere Darstellung nicht stimmt. Ach ja, die Reporter ... ich kenne so einige, die sind richtig normal. Aber es gibt leider ungemein viele, die sich so verhalten wie oben und "immer im Recht sind".

  • Mein Gott, warum denken diese "Experten" vorher nicht mal nach, bevor sie den Mund aufmachen. Dieses Mal James McFadden:


    "As we've seen with Morelos, he's suspended or he's not fit as much as he's available at times, so they need to bring someone in to help them out."

    So über jemanden zu sprechen, der bisher 26 von 28 Pflichtspielen in dieser Saison bestritten hat, ist schon komplett unüberlegt.


    Dass wir im Winter in der Offensive noch einmal nachlegen müssen, weil Sadiq offenbar keine Alternative ist, steht auf einem anderen Blatt.

    :rfc: Simply a Bear :rfc:

  • Der Ibrox Blogger des Daily Record - einst bei Rangers Media (ne Webseite, nicht vom Verein) hat sich mal über die Schwafelattacken des Wochenendes geäußert:



    It's time Rangers star Alfredo Morelos got credit he deserves and he'll fire club to 55 - James Black
    Our Ibrox blogger believes neither Rangers nor the Colombian are getting the plaudits they should be.




    Rangers returned to the top of the Scottish Premiership on Sunday after an enthralling 2-1 win over Hearts at Tynecastle - and the immediate aftermath felt as though the Gers had never been away.


    With little over 60 hours having passed after the final whistle in Thursday's Europa League draw with Villareal, Steven Gerrard's
    side put in a dogged shift to secure the three points in the capital and it instantly set many of Scottish football's talking heads into
    meltdown.


    Anyone who tuned in to BT Sport yesterday lunchtime would have been forgiven for thinking they had tuned into a weird hybrid of Celtic's and Hearts' club TV channels as Michael Stewart raved about the seemingly once-in-a-lifetime performance of the mononymic Christophe at the heart of the Jambos' defence while Rob McLean delivered his commentary with the enthusiasm of a man on his way to his own execution.


    The action on the pitch was, yet again, a fantastic advert for the Scottish game with a fantastic atmosphere at Tynecastle, a few tasty
    challenges, an own goal, a red card, a cracking strike from Alfredo Morelos(offside or not it was still a helluva finish from the Colombian) and the sort of tension at the end of the game that had Rangers fans on the edge of their seats waiting for the final whistle.


    Despite that, almost all of the post-match discussion has been focused on two decisions made by referee Bobby Madden.


    Morelos' winner was the first big talking point with Stewart and co going to great lengths to highlight the officials' error which allowed
    the Gers to pick up the win. There's no doubt the 22-year-old was just offside when he expertly hooked the ball home. Weirdly though, there
    seemed to be far more objection to the officials getting it wrong than there has been on the several occasions so far this season when Rangers have found themselves on the other end of a mistake from an official resulting in a goal.


    Maybe McLean and Stewart think it's their duty to hold Scottish officials to a higher standard than their continental counterparts but
    to the viewer at home, it only comes across as petty and bitter.


    Then there was Scotty Arfield's red card.
    Listening to some of the comments after game, you'd be forgiven for thinking that Arfield had stamped on Bobby Zlamal's head in some
    horrific out-take from American History X. Yes, the Canadian international was late with his challenge but the vast majority of fans
    would be shouting the odds if their side found themselves in a similar position and didn't challenge for the ball.


    Comically, BT Sport had a referee at Hampden for the League Cup final clash later that afternoon and when asked for his opinion, he said it
    was only worthy of a booking.


    BT never returned to that opinion and instead, McLean and Stewart continued with their 'horror challenge' line. I can only guess here but,
    had the ref at Hampden said it was a red card, I'd bet everything I own on the commentary team making repeated reference to it throughout the remainder of the game.


    It didn't get much better in the hours following the final whistle.While lunacy has become expected in the world of Scottish fitba Twitter,
    Super Scoreboard's Hugh Keevins took it to unprecedented levels when he suggested that Arfield's challenge was a particularly bad one "given that there was such a high level of concern over the head injury to Gary Mackay-Steven" in the League Cup final.


    I wouldn't pretend to be an expert on such matters but, by my watch, GMS' injury happened a couple of hours after Arfield had been sent off
    at Tynecastle. Not to mention there virtually no similarities between the two whatsoever.


    With all the gnashing of teeth and wringing of hands going on, there was barely a mention of Morelos scoring in his seventh consecutive Scottish Premiership game to equal David Clarkson's record. The 22-year-old has been immense this season for Gerrard's side and somehow doesn't get anywhere near the credit he should for his performances.


    I said earlier this year that when the Colombian does eventually move on from Ibrox that it will be for more than Celtic received for Moussa
    Dembele. Plenty scoffed at the time but at the rate he's currently going, it won't be long until Rangers have a massive decision on their
    hands over Morelos' future.


    Before then though, I wouldn't bet against the striker from riling up defenders and pundits across the country as he fires the Gers to title
    number 55.


    https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/…ers-star-alfredo-13681803

  • Der ehemalige Redakteur des Celtic View ist ja nun beim Scotsman. Dahingehend fühlt man seinen Schmerz nach dem Spiel. Man müsste mal rauskramen, was er nach dem ersten Spiel im Parkhead zu schreiben hatte, wo "die Seinen" die Sau rausließen und der Stadion-DJ nach Spielende brav die IRA-oke befeuerte.


    Comment: Vile behaviour shames fans on both sides at Ibrox


    By Andrew Smith


    It doesn’t matter about the split of the supports when Rangers and Celtic meet. Some of those in attendance will invariably induce queasiness about how low they are willing to stoop and yesterday proved no different with all but 750 in the stadium roaring on the home team. Celtic’s reduced backing did not prevent their fans deliberately disrupting the minute’s silence to remember the victims of the Ibrox disaster with a cacophony of mock coughs. When shouts from the Rangers support – which included one of “you f***** terrorist-supporting scum” – also began to puncture the air in response, referee John Beaton blew to end the minute’s silence after under 30 seconds.



    It goes without saying that the Rangers support regularly belted out anti-Catholic anthems, but they also held up banners relating to the Celtic Boys’ Club child abuse scandal in the form of “Big Jock knew” – which relates to unsubstantiated claims that the late Celtic manager Jock Stein had alleged knowledge of the abusers’ actions – while at various stages chanting “paedos” 
in reference to the recent convictions.



    However, they also had new dirt to dish with a ditty mocking the personal and mental health issues that have forced Leigh Griffiths to take time out of the game. Bellowed round the ground at intervals came a song exhorting “f*** Leigh Griffiths, you won’t be playing football any more”. Maybe one day they should consider playing these derbies behind closed doors to spare the rest of us such vile behaviour.


    Read more at: https://www.scotsman.com/sport…-sides-at-ibrox-1-4849961


    Der "arme und bedauernswerte Griffiths", dessen üble Gesten im Ibrox letzte Saison, das Provozieren unserer Fans dort wie auch nach dem Sieg im ersten Spiel sind völlig normal gewesen ähem, vergessen mein ich. Und das Big Jock Stein nicht nur angeblich sondern auch in Wirklichkeit von den Missbräuchen in seinem Verein wußte, kann der Autor bei diversen Celtic-Größen nachfragen, oder eben einfach an dem Fakt festmachen, daß er den Hauptangeklagten feuerte (und später wiedr durch die Hintertür an Bord holte). Aber Fakten und Tatsachen werden in der Welt des Celtic-Universums eher schwammig und dehnbar ...

  • Wie geschrieben, ließ sich Chris Sutton über das Unvermögen der SFA aus, Morelos nicht nachträglich zu bestrafen. Die Aktionen einiger Yahoos in diesem oder anderen Spielen fallen wie üblich unter den Tisch.






    Eine Attacke gegen die SFA und den Schiri nach der nächsten. Sie hatten 7 Jahre einen freien Lauf zur Meisterschaft und drehen nach einer Niederlage völlig frei und reden ihrerseits von Schiebung etc. Muss man erstmal hinbekommen, ist in deren Universum aber nicht wesensfremd.

  • Ewan Cameron tweet.
    I can’t make my mind up if@chris_sutton73is a master troll, one of the worst pundits in Scotland or a combination of both. However, everyone in entitled to an opinion cause, like arseholes, we all have one. It’s just a shame that many speak out of theirs.

Jetzt mitmachen!

Sie haben noch kein Benutzerkonto auf unserer Seite? Registrieren Sie sich kostenlos und nehmen Sie an unserer Community teil!